Book Review: Angel by Jason Calacanis

About the book’s Author: Jason Calacanis is the man behind the Launch Incubator and one of the most interesting and well-attended demo days in San Francisco.  He is easily one of the top 10 most-active angel investors in Silicon Valley.  He is also one of the most successful.  He wasn’t born rich but worked to get where he is.  This book is a gift to all of you who want something similar.


 

This book is written as a broad introduction to Angel Investing, with small tidbits about Jason’s own experience and some application of his own style of investing.  He’s clearly a proponent of handing out a little money to almost every startup, and then following-on with more money once successes are reached, letting the losers die.

In the first 6 chapters, he talks about the basics and gives some background on his career.  The following chapters are then about different kinds of angel investing, pitch meetings, deal memos, negotiating, communication, due diligence and an investment strategy.

I would say that this would be a good book of required reading for club members.  This is the way I expect the angels to work with my companies, and the way I expect of myself to act with them.  I’d be willing to add that those of you who have not read the book yet, would quickly sign-on to its value as a guideline.

Two things that I learned from the book:

  1. write a deal memo of why I put money into a company and return to it on a yearly basis, or at a new funding round.
  2. invest more, but in smaller amounts (for us it means to be involved in more syndicates)

He doesn’t speak much about the secrets of screening or filtering startups (he seems to hint that this is another book) but the mechanics of angel investing are covered well and should be read to broaden the novice’s exposure to the art form.

The book can be found on Amazon or your favourite bookseller in hard copy, digital or audio formats.  You can also borrow my copy if you want to keep your cash for your next seed round.  But I said BORROW.

 


Disclosure: I met Jason when I participated in the Launch competition in 2013.  Here’s a video of Kevin Kliman leading the pitch for Instarad.io, and my fat fingers on the Elmo showing how the prototype app works.  There are a few shots of me on the side acting like a piece of furniture if you were wondering.  Thanks to Kevin for letting me experience all this fun.


– Andrew Opala, club member

@TheMIN.ca – 2018 May

Our first month on MailChimp went well: lessons learned is that any subscribers to the newsletter need to wait until next month for the following newsletter and don’t get sent the most recent one which was automatic on our old platform.  Also, we have a 0% unsubscribe rate thus far and a 62% open rate.  We never received this information from the Listserv so it’s new to us.

The gang at theMin.ca went to a number of events in Mississauga, Toronto, and Waterloo last month.  Some interesting startups and ideas were seen.  We’ve been following up with the founders and teams as time has allowed.  Some team members also visited a number of Angel groups and Accelerators in the last month and will make a presentation to the team at our next meeting.

Andrew has a meeting with the Mayor of Mississauga on Tuesday, June 18, to review the interest the City would have in associating itself with our activities and perhaps supporting an Accelerator.

Going back to the First Round 2015 post about the top 10 findings of successful startups, the number 6 reason for success is co-founders do better than solo founders.  We actually can add a lot of information to this from our own deal flow information:

  • Founderfuel – 0.5x better exit rate for 2 founders over solo founder
  • TechStars – 1.5x better exit rate for 2 founders over solo founder
  • YCombinator – 1.3x better exit rate for 2 founders over solo founder
  • 500 Startups – 1.3x better exit rate for 2 founders over solo founder

When you look at it, you could convince yourself the reason is that one founder has to dedicate themselves to raising money and selling the product, and the other has to build it.  When you have only one founder, they are responsible for everything.  Want to spend time with your new-born son, or sleep in once, or get your appendix removed?  Well, you’re behind schedule if you are a solo founder.  We’ll add this to our filter. (hmmm Founderfuel looks a little weak but the sample size was small)

The newsletter is looking for someone or a group of people to interview Angels who can relate their first investment and what they learned.  We’d like it to be a regularly occurring part of the newsletter.

Happy boating and travels everyone, we will see each other in person in September!

 

Founder Profile: Bill Sharpe

Bill Sharpe is the former Chairman and CEO of Havas Worldwide, founder and CEO of Sharpe-Blackmore, MD of DDB Canada, President of Robins Sharpe. Currently his styling himself as CEO of a new marketing startup Simmons Sharpe.  We met with Bill at the Prohibition Gastrohouse on Queen East.  Over a beer and cobb salad, Bill told us why he was so successful over is last 4 startups: picking a great co-founder, filling gaps, and timing the visit just right to the anchor client.

What do you look for in a partner?

  1. The first attribute is always Trust.  Do you trust the person? Do you have the ability to have a dialogue during not just the easy times but the difficult times? Because obviously, every business will go through extremely tough times.
  2. Is it a complementary skillset?  Do they do something much better than I do?  Then I should be able to do things much better than they do.  And therefore we’re not bumping heads all the time and overlapping.  It’s almost as if automatically some problem comes in and we both look at it and go, “this is yours“.  “This is a math issue and you’re a math genius.” If it’s a softer issue or a client issues it’s, “this is for me.”  I learned this the hard way. I started my first Agency when I was 34, and I knew virtually nothing about running a company.  The only thing I had run before was a kid residential YMCA summer camp. So that’s how I ran the agency … like a YMCA summer camp.
  3. Another thing with partners is you need to understand what’s going on with customers and who works best with them. So my first partner was a total opposite of me, hyper-aggressive and totally willing to kill, and so what happened was we balanced each other out because we had trust and we listened to each other about being more aggressive or being more passive.  When a customer came in and said “I want to meet you today and then 3 months from now after your success report”, that was my partners. When a customer came in and said “I want to take measured and planned steps to get to my goal,” I spoke with them.
  4. Finally, when you are bound together by only money it’s not a great partnership, so do you have shared economics of what’s going on beyond the money?  It doesn’t take long to understand the softer side of the business – the question is do I want to keep working with this person? Are they going to respect my time?  Are they going to see me as a professional who engineers things or as a mechanic who waits for things to break? If they see me as a mechanic the relationship won’t last long.  So from the get-go, you need that consistent vision of what we want to do together.

How did you decide to pivot in your current business from a service offering to more of a technology offering?

I saw a gap.  The gap I saw was essentially between the agency holding companies and the Deloitte’s and Accenture’s coming down the alley buying agencies. The agencies being in the middle.  Then there are big production companies who started scooping up experiential marketing companies and they were coming up from the bottom.  So if you are an agency, you’re high cost, you actually can’t innovate because “New York won’t let you innovate” and you can innovate only if you want to take a real career risk yourself. You are stuck in the middle with a known offering and a dwindling market. 

So the gap could be filled with a digitally-focused consulting company, that actually executes but doesn’t touch anything that is conventional. As soon as you touch anything conventional you become a threat to the agencies.  For us, that leaves ROI-based digital strategies. 

So that’s where we pivoted.  The Deloitte’s buy agencies because they have great connections with CMOs.  We want to develop those relationships with CMOs as well by being innovative and efficiently solving the new problems.  That might be an exit for us.

Advice for founders who want to reach an anchor customer

There’s nothing so compelling as going to your customer and showing them a good demo.  Can you deliver?  That’s the million dollar question.  If you bobble the delivery that’s the end of the relationship.  You need to get this right by practice and rehearsal and understanding what the client wants from you.

Going back to my industry, the CMOs are risk averse because it is such a complicated World.  But the see-saw is that if you are too risk averse the competition will outflank you and you lose your job.  Or you make a bad choice and you lose your job.  What you need to understand is that you can bring a solution to this embattled CMO figure and ease their pain and nudge them to move forward.

This brings me to the other thing I have seen work if the demo doesn’t impress them.

Heather my partner is a phenomenal researcher.  She wasn’t asked to do it, but she uncovered some solid gold information about one of our client’s core businesses.  When we presented our findings to them they were floored that we brought such an important insight into the business they were in for decades.

So those two things: a great demo or business insights that give the client an advantage.  Because they are both novel and you can leverage them into a relationship.

For us, we went from “a basic supplier” to “wow! you guys understand where our business is going!”

Any advice for new hires entering a new role that could be beyond their skillset?

I’m a firm believer of actually giving someone a shot.  Whether they fail or succeed at a big task they do uncover truths about themselves and we can then build a great career on the things they are good at.  When I had the feeling that someone could do it I would give them a shot, but I would build up a lot of oversite because after all, we’re a business, not an educational institution.  We couldn’t damage a deliverable or a client relationship.

What I’ve seen is that technically most young people are smack on to the sweet-spot of a role, but what’s missing in all of the failures I have seen is the soft skills.  By that I mean they failed to read the room – and reading the room is something that comes from experience.

What newly promoted employees should admit this to themselves is that they are not a 75-year-old master negotiator.  Soft skills come from time spent with people, there are very few naturals with this attribute, and there is no education for this just lots of experience.  Admit it.  Ask for mentorship.  You will be an asset sooner than you think.

 


Bill can be reached at his new marketing startup Simmons Sharpe Inc., or through LinkedIn.

The RIC Centre – Mississauga’s Answer to MarsDD

Pam Banks, the head of the Mississauga RIC Centre has been growing and guiding its activities for the past 14 years.  She spoke to us by phone on what the RIC Centre has to offer for startups.

Please give us some context on what the RIC Centre is

The RIC Centre is a not-for-profit organization working to support innovative businesses within the Ontario Network of Entrepreneurs.  As the Entrepreneur and Innovation Hub for Mississauga, Brampton, and Caledon, co-located with industry partners Xerox Research Centre of Canada and GreenCentre Canada, the RIC Centre offers a comprehensive range of support services to entrepreneurs for free, including mentorship and advisory services, hands-on workshops and networking events.  Our charter is given to us through the Ontario Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation, and Trade.

At its core, our organization seeks to help build commercial value for companies that reach out to us.

In the past 14 years, we’ve had close to 600 clients in all stages of business. Although we’re open to all industries, we are strategically focusing on the following sectors this year:

  • Advanced Manufacturing & Materials
  • Clean & Green Technologies
  • ICT & Internet of Things

We tackle any next steps our clients need: we can review their product or validate their market, we can help commercialize, we can help with strategic partnerships or sales.

How are you able to help these companies moving along successfully in making an impact?

We have three very skilled part-time entrepreneurs-in-residence.

  • Geoff Simonett – helps companies get to the financing-readiness state (Software, Marketing, Financial Services, IT, CleanTech and MedTech)
  • James Sbrolla – helps companies through the commercialization process (Financial Services, Environmental, Publishing, Communications, and Media)
  • Paul Barter – helps companies take advantage of technology trends and to discover the strategic value in overcoming technical challenges (Innovative Tech)

We also have about 100 volunteer advisors who offer their time for one-on-one mentorship.  The volunteers are domain experts who want to give back to the community others are cashed-out entrepreneurs wanting to share what they have learned.

Give us some idea how you capture or filter companies 

We use the Startup Genome to quantize the clients choosing to enter our program.  We have a continuous intake for our broad service offerings, but for the incubator program, we do an intake twice a year in Winter and at the End of Summer.  We have room for 5 in-house companies and 10 non-resident companies in each cohort.  We filter based on giving the client the highest potential impact from our services and we plan everything around a 6-month milestone like a first sale or a key partnership.

Do you have any programs for companies that don’t want to be involved in the incubator?

We have one or two in-house workshops a week.  These are topic-based sessions on specific aspects of being a startup.  These would be things like the basics of running a small business, validating your business model, or talent acquisition and retention.  We have lots of space to chose from and we also run events outside of the Centre throughout Peel Region.

Any big successes you want to mention?

There have been many but let’s look at a recent company like AOMS Technologies.  They just placed funding from OCE and GreenSky Capital.  They’re an optical sensing company with hardware that works in the harshest environments.  The started in Waterloo but went through our incubator in 2016 and received their funding during their tenancy and the year following.  In total, they have received just under $1M in funding.  Another company on a similar trajectory is Meemin Inc and their product vGIS.  It’s an Augmented-Reality tool for field personnel to see in real-time where pipes, underground cables, and valves exist to limit damage and improve the speed of inspection.  They were showcased at our First Look event at City Hall in Mississauga last month.


You can reach the RIC Centre tucked away on the South side of the Xerox Research Centre on Speakman Drive, or through their contact page on their site.

 

The Big Push – A Bootstrapped Incubator

When I was snooping around some nascent incubators in the city I stumbled upon one by women for women.  They don’t put any money into your startup, instead, they join your staff and share their experience with you.  The incubator has the clever name of The Big Push.

I spoke with Sharon Zohar, the founding partner last week.

They have a strong value proposition.  Most incubators promise you mentoring, but The Big Push basically gives you a seasoned expert in a business lane (finance, marketing, operations, public relations, sales, partnership development, legal, HR).  I can’t tell you how much I could have done with an expert salesperson who could help a junior team ramp lead generation and filtering prospects.  Instead, we were hiring endlessly and always got someone willing to learn because we couldn’t afford the high-salary and commission of a veteran sales rep. Then the endless hours training.  Clearly, there is something here.

The one weakness in this model is that the founding team bringing the startup to The Big Push, needs to truly accept mentoring and giving up part of their big idea to seasoned co-founders.  Just seeing the number of obstinant male-led teams who wanted to do it their way, my guess is they would have no one knocking on their door.  But, that obstinacy might be more present in males.  All of the women founders and co-founders I have worked with were willing to learn and were eager to work with partners.  Now that I think of it The Big Push looks even stronger when you realize it’s women for women.  I didn’t get a sense that men will be excluded as the company develops, but instead, that this was a very positive and broad action to help women become strong founders.

The program runs 4-6 months.  They currently have 2 startups and want to have that up to 10 by the end of the year.  Zohar said, “we have 10 senior execs within every lane.”  Their 10 experts might be tasked if they grow to 10 companies, but she added: “there are plans to grow their management bench to 50”.

They are also looking for Angels and VCs who understand the value they offer (from their service-for-equity model) to help build out their follow-on abilities with a Series A.

If you’d like to meet with some of Zohar’s team or see what The Big Push is all about, they have an event at Uberflip on Dufferin on the 31st of May – Hiring Practices to Increase Diversity and Inclusion.

***

I think the model is sound, the niche is receptive, and there should be a considerable interest from the follow-on environment when the start-ups develop.


Sharon Zohar was interviewed by Andrew Opala.

How is the Sausage Made?

From Seed Round to Series A in Ontario

As a sometimes-founder, sometimes-angel, I have always wondered about funding and finding a source of information as a benchmark. “Are we taking too long to do this thing?” “When should we have started to do that thing?” “Do I need to talk about this at that meeting?” “Am I missing this in my plan?”

One question I asked and one that was asked regularly by teams I visited as an angel was “How long after a Seed Round should a company get a Series A?” Three companies ago, I went to my lead investor for advice. But to my surprise when I blurted this out over coffee he basically looked back at me and said, “You should know!” He was absolutely right. I should. But what I wanted was an answer to another question, “if I want $X million in the bank by date Y, when do I have to start the roadshow? What is a typical roadshow? How long do they take?” Fundraising was hit or miss for me. It was hard sitting across from a person 25 years my junior as they explained to me what the Internet is or what a cell phone is. I have tried to be so successful, I would never have to deal with such clueless punks again, and now I want to convey a bit of what I learned so you all can be more successful.

 

The Deal Flow

We went through our public deal flow database we have at theMIN.ca and started some research. We started off with companies that have headquarters in Ontario. Companies that published the Seed Round attributes such as amount, date, investor. Companies that published the same amount of information about their Series A if it occurred. Finally, we tried our best to track whether a company was active or not. Basically, this was the following: check that the website works, that LinkedIn has people currently employed there, Dun & Bradstreet may have a file on them, and Industry Canada has a listing for them. Our database has companies from summer of 2000 onward, so about 18 years worth of data. We don’t see all deal flow, but the major VCs, Angels, and Wealth Funds who publicize investment and acquisition to stay transparent.

We found that 644 companies fit our filter. Another 899 did not report the amount of their seed round. An astounding 547 are still active of the 644 in the primary group (this may be more for our selective data inputting in the past than reality). Only about 10% of these companies received a Series A. We don’t have information about who tried for one and it wasn’t granted, so this is just a number in our books. But it does show you that a Series A is not always needed, guaranteed, or granted. Don’t go overboard quoting these numbers. Most startups fail after the 2nd year, and funded startups have a slightly better success rate. Our rates are for a selection and should be taken as truthful only for this publicly available information.

Next, we binned the 66 companies of the 644 who reported the amount of the two raises. To create the following graph.

The bin groups are in $250k-seed groups below $1M Seed Round and $500k-seed groups over $1M investment. The blue bars are the average Series A raise for that bin group. The solid red line is the average number of years for each bin group to get a Series A. You can discover what you like from the graph, but here’s what I get out of it. Firstly, a Series A in Ontario for companies getting a Seed of $250K-$3.5M is on average about $7M (green dotted line). Secondly, the time from a Seed Round to a Series A event drops from around 2.7 years for a $250K seeded company to about 1 year for a $4M Seed Round (red dotted line). There are a couple of questions that come to mind, how can a company spend 2 years living off of $250K? These companies might already have offsetting revenue and they took less money because they needed less. How can a company get $4M in a Seed Round and then have to go back to the markets for a Series A of $13M? I can see a funder liking the scaling possibilities and putting these amounts into the second round.

 

Deal Timing

Here is a distribution of the companies that shows that 24 companies received seed funding in the $1M-$2M range, while 16 companies received under $500K. From my experience, it’s rare for a startup to ask for $550K or $950K. But $1M or $500K is seen often. There shouldn’t be this gap, but there is in this chart and in my experience.

Another interesting thing is if there is a best time to ask for money – summer, fall, etc. From the table below and the expanded graph, we can see that deal flow was not equal across each month.

Period Deals
Q1 21
Q2 9
Q3 12
Q4 24

This could be the timing of the company or this deal flow could be induced by the Investors. My guess is you should plan for these dates as the dates you get your money and work backward the 3-7 months of seeking money. So for October start seeking money in April, for January in July. If we break up when the deals were done based on the size of the Seed Round we see another graph.

Basically, the smaller-sized Seed companies (<$1M – red), raised their money throughout the year, mostly in January. The mid-sized Seed companies ($1M-$2M – green), raised their money in November and January. The large-sized Seed companies (>$2M – purple), raised their money in October with smaller deals in November and June and never in July and August. When we examined when deals were made by the top VCs, it was clear that deals where publicised rather evenly throughout the year. But when we looked at when companies Lead and when they Followed-on showed that most companies who Lead did fewer deals of that type during the Summer. My only guess here is the people doing the Due Diligence were off and the load had to be reduced. But they Followed-On evenly throughout the year. So I guess an LP or VC reviewed things quickly in the Summer when some other VC Lead.

We know when to go back to the market based on what my Seed Round is, and we know how much to ask for. Now, how long does the process take?

Road-Show Expectations

If you think this first part was unscientific, pull out the Ouija Board and the Tarot Cards, because this next part is a pure argument rather than empirical proof. We went to the major Series A funders and asked them for their checklist to consider a Series A and the time it takes to get the money. After a few quick emails and shared URLs, we discovered they had no time for us. So we went to the people who negotiated the Series A in our study for their input. Most of them had no time for us. But we did get some responses (exactly 10) and here are the results.

  • 100% went back to their Seed Round funders for more money first
  • 80% of Seed Round funders introduces them to follow-on funders who they have worked with before
  • Only 10% of Seed Round Investors were involved in the Series A
  • Bridge-debt and spot rounds of Angel Investments where suggested in 20% of the cases
  • From 4-30 presentations where made for investors, the median was 12 presentation
  • Most presentations were done by teleconference with the key presentation being done in person
  • The process took from 3-12 months to complete
  • Most agreed that they could have started the Series A roadshows sooner but they wanted good news to report on their decks so they waited for some key milestones to be reached
  • Meetings were booked once they had good news, in one case they had no good news, but spun what they had – they all wanted to demonstrate that “lack of cash was a constraint”
  • DD period usually took one dedicated person at the company about 15 days of collecting information and sending data per Investor signing an LOI
  • Most have exclusivity requirements for a DD session so you couldn’t do two DD sessions at once
  • Each group had between 1-2 DD periods in the fundraising cycle
  • Much of the information collected for one DD period was reusable for the next
  • No one went shopping for better terms after they received their first term sheet
  • The Series A ranged from 75% to 110% subscribed
  • All companies had positive Y/Y Revenue growth in the range of 50%-90%
  • ARR of +$1Million was mentioned in 2 of the 10 case

 

Conclusions

Unscientifically (we didn’t call the companies who didn’t report a raise but maybe tried), you need to start fundraising and visiting your 12 investors about 7 months before you need the money from one of them. You might also want to consider the size of your Seed Round and decide when to fundraise based on when things seem to happen with these graphs.

One last piece of information is to expect rejection. These 66 companies in our dataset are survivor-biased. The actual numbers are 1 in 40 companies will get a Seed Round. 1 in 400 will get a Series A. Most people don’t want to know how the sausage is made, because the truth hurts. But I have the deepest amount of respect for the dreamers – so don’t give up. The answer will come from your hard work!

 

Executive Summary

  • An average Series A is about $7Million for an Ontario-based start-up
  • The average time to close a Series A ranges from 2.7 years for a small seeded company to 1.1 years for a larger seeded company
  • A successful contact-to-funding for a Series A is in the range of 1-3 months
  • Most Series-A-searches for an interested contact takes between 3-9 months
  • 1 in 10 companies who are seeded have the operational results necessary for a Series A
  • Larger seeds need to pass on Summer Funding activities (maybe because the larger funders are off in this period)

 

 

Profile: Densyfy

Densyfy is a proprietary AI driven solution that enables the viewers to easily customize what they want to watch based on their time constraints. Only have 20 minutes to catch up on all your favorite hour-long programs? Not a problem! Watch the densyfied version…

What makes Densyfy different is how we enable delivery of relevant content without modifying the original by utilizing dynamic, real-time video customization. At any time the viewer is able to increase or decrease the video duration and keep watching without disruption.

 

Have you ever watched Jays in 30 on Sportsnet?  A media operator has to review each game and select the interesting pieces for you to watch.  What if you could do that for different sports, games, events and do it automatically.  Densyfy promises this kind of solution.  It could be applied to a viewer-directed model or a content-delivery model.

You are welcome to reach the Densyfy team to request more information at info@densyfy.com.

Founder Profile: Kevin Kliman

Kevin Kliman is the CEO and co-founder of Humi HR, an HR benefits management company. Kevin is a 2nd-time founder with focus and vision and has lived the Silicon Valley dream with his startups since 2012, by keeping his ear to the ground in San Francisco and basing his teams in Toronto.  Humi HR works in the same category as Gusto ($1 Billion valuation) and Zenefits ($2 Billion valuation).

Funding how much time did it take? How many people did you visit?

We’re probably somewhat of an anomaly for the Toronto startup ecosystem. We raised $2.5 million dollars at the end of 2 ½ weeks and it’s mostly because we went through Y Combinator. Prior to Y Combinator, we spent approximately 3 months talking to people in Toronto and we had gotten about a million dollars in commitments. We eventually told those people we couldn’t take their money just because when we got to Y Combinator they told us to go back to our old investors and hold off until we finish the program and had a better understanding of our valuation and trajectory. At the end of that program, Y Combinator does a really good job of creating a market for the companies that go through it. And a lot of pressure on the investors to act and act quickly to create valuations that are significantly higher than they are in Toronto.

How hard was it to get into Y Combinator?

So we’re also a special case where Y Combinator is concerned. I applied for Y Combinator Office Hours when they came to Toronto. They do it as a way to spread the word and meet new interesting startups. I met them on a Saturday after a soccer game. I did the 15-minute pitch. I got home later that night and they asked me to come to San Francisco in 2 days time to interview to join the Y Combinator cohort that had already started. We had a team of 13 and we were required to be there every other week for a team board meeting and a dinner. We went down every other week for 36 hours at a time. Just the founders went because of our unusual position of getting in the program late, we could keep the main team here in Toronto.

Can you describe the program a bit?

You have to meet every 2 weeks and you will be pushed on the progress you’ve made, culminating in a demo day. This is their idea of a board meeting. On those days they have impressive speakers at a hosted team dinner for great insights and ideas as well. They also offer office hours for you to reach out to these founders and mentors. But the main theme of the setup is heads-down focus and to use their resources as they are needed. These are the terms, take it or leave it. One of the founders of Zenefits went through the Y Combinator program again with his new startup Rippling. The terms were not what the founder wanted, but he accepted anyway because he knew the benefits and results of the program.

Because Humi HR was modeled after two very successful companies that went through Y Combinator they already had metrics and starting points for that type of a business model. A lot of the questions were related to those two companies, to the market and they wanted to know about Canada and how we would do a Canada-only play. Their big questions where: Is it a big enough market to build a $1 Billion company. How are our growth rates different from Zenefits, how are they the same? How are we going to go to the marketplace with an offering? The founders of Zenefits and Gusto, employees and investors gave us a lot of knowledge and they were part of our mentor team at Y Combinator.

How valuable do you think pitching is for a company?

For people who get inundated with pitches, it’s important that they get the sense that you not only understand the business you are operating, but you understand what the potential outcomes are, what are you driving towards and how you get there. I don’t think you need to know exactly how you get there but you need to have intelligently formed a good narrative. So if you’re creating a Saas company you should know what the expectations are for your type of company at your stage and what the next steps are to get to the next stage. If you can’t do this on a stage or at a whiteboard in about 15 minutes, you are not ready to for money.

We’ve heard of some pitch competitions where they give you some non-dilutive capital. What advice would you give to startups thinking of getting into these pitch competitions?

I’d look for the opportunity costs. How much preparation should I have to do for it? What are the odds that I will get X number of dollars and X benefit out of it? Will I have a better or worse future if I enter? If someone is offering to take 15-20% of your company and offering to reach investors in the golden horseshoe you should think again. You could reach these investors on LinkedIn yourself without giving up a part of your company. Is this your second company and you know the first 5 things to do? If you need this type of capital to get going then it might make sense. There are no clear answers here, I would suggest you need to look at where it gets you after it happens.

What do you think you did wrong in this process?

We had a lot of false assumptions on the market and the product, how we were going to sell it, how to onboard and hire and how to structure compensation. I think failing a 1000 times is fine as long as you make progress in understanding the process. Investors like the learning abilities you bring to the table. This sense of exploration and passion by you actually lowers the risk for them. When people invest at this stage they expect you to be 99% wrong. I have heard people say that when they get their seed stage it’s 90% story and 10% actual execution.

Advice for estimating your market?

If you are selling 300 units per year to scientists, you want to figure out how much are you selling them for? Is there enough to get to the venture scale? Are scientists sales-cycles very long with small budgets?

Or going the other way, you have 7 billion people in your market and I want to give it away for free. I’d want to know how you can get 100 people to love the product. Then you can scale that. Is the customer is engaged? What is their true value?

In either case, there may be no market if you can’t do the math and make a profit and have a growth plan.

When would you go for debt and when would you go for equity?

We will use debt in every round of financing, because very simply, paying 6% on borrowed money is less expensive than selling equity. I feel that my equity will grow 100x in the next 10 years. BDC expansion loans (almost free money) are what we would be after. ECanadianadian should go to BDC first, then SVB, most of the Canadian banks are starting to come out with the SVB type of offerings and the competition will help.

LBOs in the Old Economy

Hammond Paper is a provider of quality and custom paperboard, chipboard, cardboard for many uses such as liners, packaging, signage, board games, bookbinding, and furniture. David Campbell recently bought this “old economy” business from a retiring baby-boomer and he tells us how he did it and why. David Campbell is a 20-year veteran of the C-Suite. Ten months into his grand strategy to take over the World, we spoke to him over a steak sandwich with grilled mushrooms and peppers at a picnic table in Concord.

How did this deal shape out?

The Need

I’ve always wanted to do my own thing so I made the decision that I want to run and own my own business.  The feedback I got from my close network was that a lot of baby boomers, people in their 60s and 70s who built businesses over the years are now looking to retire and they have no succession plans.

So I got out there and started talking to people.

The Math

Quickly looking at what was available, you should be able to buy an old economy business doing about 10% EBITDA margin at 2-4 EBITDA earnings multiple.  Realistically you should probably be able to get vendor take-back of 30% of the purchase price, part of it you could finance with a BDC-like loan, and the rest you could risk your own capital.  There were a lot of businesses in this cohort.

Looking at some of these companies, a lot of these business owners are in coast mode.  And by coast mode, I mean very good in the day-to-day stuff but not doing any investments to grow and think of projects that have a timeline of longer than a year.   And most of these companies do not do any sophisticated or structured marketing.

I had the view that I could grow the top line revenue by 50% over the course of three or four years and probably drop 30% of that to the bottom line (maybe even 50%) and if you can do that then the multiple looks even cheaper.

Plus, if you look hard there’s probably some immediate cost savings in some of these business activities. Using some rough numbers of $3-$5 million revenue range, and a 5% EBITDA margin means $250 thousand EBITDA.  Let’s say the company is renting a lot of warehouse space and I’ve been able to sublet almost 15,000 square feet and the value of that is $150,000 a year.  So now with one action, I have gone from $250 to $400 in EBITDA and I didn’t pay for it anywhere on my balance sheet.  The money was just sitting there.

The Business

When I looked at these things I asked myself:

(1) do I like the industry?

I did not know the industry well, but I felt the eco-friendly nature of paper versus plastic was a long-term “good” factor.  I also believed a disciplined marketing plan could be a growth driver because of the e-commerce factor I was going to introduce.

(2) do I like the people running the business?

I like the people, everyone I met seemed to be really grounded people. They were good at what they’ve been doing and they’ve been in that business for a while so I wasn’t concerned that I was going to buy a company and people would leave me standing around with no clue.  I trust the guy who was selling the business and I knew a buddy of his we knew him well and vouch for his dependability and integrity and I knew he would stick around and teach me stuff as opposed to just taking my money and paying lip service to help me out over the next 6 months that was part of the deal. That’s part of a good deal – to find somebody who will stick around for a while.

(3) can I negotiate a Vendor Take Back?

I was able to get a vendor take-back for about 30% of the purchase price.  This was an important part of the decision process.  

(4) can I get bank and other financing?

I was able to get bank financing for about 50% of the purchase price and then I found 20% of my own money to put in the deal as cash on day 1. From a finance perspective that works pretty well too. this kind of arrangement limits the amount of capital you put up at the front of a deal and increases your leverage when the deal grows, which helps drive the ROI significantly on the back end.

What’s a good profile of someone wanting to do this themselves?

(1) I think it’s somebody who is willing to work hard at it. I did put in long hours – on average 12 hour days to get my head around the business and do all the daily stuff that the previous owner had been doing in 6 or 7 hours a day.  He had the advantage of training himself to do it properly over 25 years. So energy and willingness to learn and work.

(2) You need some math and finance skills especially in this business which is very large and margin driven. It’s not an easy business because of the cost structures and the deal-to-deal makeup of a sale. Most of the time it’s one-off deals. So your negotiating skills need to be informed by the numbers.

(3) The ability to work with people. If I had difficulty speaking with people on my new team and they decided to leave I could not have taken over this business.

(4) Lastly, in my opinion, every CEO should be able to sell. You can’t come into this kind of relationship and believe you can sit at your desk and the company’s going to run itself.  You have to know who your customer is, you have to be able to approach them, and you have to sell them the deal so that you will make money.  You’re not just selling something to a customer; you’re convincing suppliers to give you credit or to lower the price of something, or you’re talking to a partner to give you a break on some idea or help you with the project, or you have to convince your staff that you’re going to come on board and they’re going to benefit from you coming on board.

To this last point, what did you do to give the team a feeling of confidence when you came on board?

The first thing I did was to have a town hall meeting and lunches with key individuals and I wanted to make sure that everybody knew what I wanted to accomplish.  This town hall meeting was actually refreshing for the staff and they gave me a chance when I bought the company. There were some key people in there who I thought were underpaid relative to what they were doing especially since they were key to running important components of the business (components the original owner could manage himself but I didn’t understand well and were a risk for me), so one of the first things I did was adjust some salaries to reflect the work these key people were doing.  

Do you have your own transition plan? Where are you going?

I bought this business with the intention of making it five times what it is today over the course of the next five or ten years. I’ve done a lot of things and I like being a business operator. I like getting my hands dirty and I’d rather do that than being a consultant off to the side. I like being the owner and the driver rather than one employee of many.

I have no intention of selling it. If it’s successful I’d look at handing it over to my kids, but I still have a ton of ideas I want to do with the business and I want to experiment with the best ones. This could include acquisitions and roll-ups. I said to myself don’t make any big moves in the first year, get to know the business and the industry.  Even though I want to do big stuff I’m not ready yet. There is a lot of tactical stuff and day-to-day stuff that I’m still trying to just do really well.  I should have a more refined strategic plan by the end of this year.

Have there been any hiccups along the way?

I’ve over bid on certain RFPs and day to day quotes and lost them, and underbid on certain deals and won them – sometimes giving up a whack of margin versus what the original owner would have done so there’s been a learning curve there for these one-off deals. It hurts the revenue and margins on both sides of the equation but that’s part of the learning process. But I did hire a new sales guy within 3 weeks of buying the business and beefed up our sales capabilities in other ways, and we are driving new revenues.

What software, processes or data capture are you doing?

I wasn’t sure what the key metrics were, so we started monitoring some key values such as new customers, return customers, revenue per customer, gross margins.

We issued a corporate handbook with company policies from “Soup To Nuts”, including harassment policy and vacation clauses. It all just flowed out of standard operating practices but there was nothing in writing earlier and it helps people understand that we were going to follow the same rules for everybody. This helped us shape accountability as well.

We introduced quote tracking so that we have a history of what we won and lost and to understand what the market rates are.  You can go back and do the analysis and see which ones you’re winning and which ones you’re not.

We also picked a CRM system called “insightly” (we’re a small company and I’m not a sophisticated guy) and we are using this for prospect tracking. We use MailChimp as an email platform to reach our customers.

Currently, we are writing a quality manual, just around processes and procedures for optimal efficiency and quality of the production side.  I’m working with the plant manager and the office manager on that manual.

Do you think an increase in the federal lending rate will limit this kind of activity in the future?

There are a lot of people operating in old economy businesses, that have no overhead, and one-point in interest rates won’t make or break their business. A key point is keeping your overheads down. And if your competitor has been running the business for 20 years and he’s paid off his equipment and building and you are paying your debt service on payout and equipment, that’s tough.

Old economy businesses are pretty competitive. So when I did my financing, I locked in a rate for 5 years. I didn’t want the risk of having rates go up a lot with a floating rate. I might have paid 2% more over this time. My guess was that interest rates will be going up and that helped me sleep at night.

Did you ever think of taking on a partner?

Yes. I have had constant discussions with various people I know and trust I want to bring in somebody else. I like the simplicity of being the sole owner, but I also believe other people with skin in the game and insights help the business run. Give them a vested interest in the success.  That being said, I’ve raised a lot of money for various companies and having the right partner is critical – you need to be aligned in your vision of what you want the company to be and I think most importantly that you need to have the same risk profile. If I want to swing for the fences, but my partner wants to play it safe and grow at 3% per year, there’s going to be conflict and it won’t be worth it.

Creating a board of advisors of like-minded owners who could help me manage from the point of view of similar businesses is another idea. Twice a year you show up and present your business and ask others for input.  If I don’t get someone as an equity investor I may go down that path.

Do you know what you don’t know?

I’ve been around and helped start and grow a number of small businesses so I have a good perspective on most areas of business, but there’s two areas that are really not my area of expertese:
(1) Manufacturing.  I’ve not moved in this world at all and Idon’t know a whole bunch of stuff in this area, and
(2) Marketing. I know about the magic digital marketing can do, and I know what is possible, but I need a lot of help with these campaigns. I haven’t got around to completing my bigger marketing plan.  Branding is another component I need help with. We should be branding our company and our products and services for the long term.  

In both these areas, I am speaking to people who can be part of our team to own these areas of the business.  

Last words?

I lucked out with a really great owner who transitioned to me over a 6-month period and is still available when I have a problem or can’t figure something out.  I think the fact that he succeeds when I do, puts him in my corner also.  The last word would be: surround yourself with bright, energetic people and create a structure for them to benefit from your success.

Founder Dating: May 2018

Often no Salary, just shares.  Not very enticing for everyone, but this has worked for some of the membership. You need to put up with a lot of crap, but if you are a star, this is what you must do to become one of the co-founder elite.  Check out these listings for yourself on AngelList.

Startup Tagline Position Sought Top Equity
The Facing Page: Editorial services Evolving text-based media toward perfection using nature-inspired heuristics Marketing manager/Cofounder 25.0%
Nonviolent a revolutionary non-profit organization that helps reducing world’s violent crime CTO 20.0%
Riverwood Acoustics Reclaimed wooden wireless home speakers Digital marketing and sales 20.0%
Rewardify Store-Credit + Incentives – Built for Shopify Business Partner / Investor 20.0%
myLinkReel Social network to find and share film recommendations iOS Swift Developer 20.0%
ellie ellie: An Effectively Altruistic Decentralized Cryptocurrency Exchange Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer 15.0%
VoxTonePRO We’ll make you sound big! I/OS Developer for Iphone & Ipad 15.0%
Comuet Technologies Peer to peer delivery Software Engineer 15.0%
Suited A habit-based nutrition coaching app. Android Engineer 15.0%
Wantboard An eCommerce marketplace that lets you request and buy items not available in your country Marketing Director 10.0%
SMRT TEC Automated Robotic Home Solutions Chief Technical Officer (CTO)/Co-Founder 10.0%
Psonya Computer Vision and Deep Learning Engineer 10.0%
GoParkr Find and reserve parking anytime anywhere – or rent out your spots! Product Designer 7.5%
Destin AI Canada’s prominent AI powered platform & chatbot solution for immigration applicants. Immigration Lawyer – Core Team Member 7.0%